Thread:Paladin Aladin/@comment-38109392-20190904010601/@comment-2194058-20190904134530

Hello, I don't usually like to butt in into other's conversations, but I did want to provide my insight on this situation.

I understand your frustration of putting in a lot of work, only to have it altered in some way. Trust me, I've had these experiences all the time in my near-10 years of editing wikis. If you have joined our Discord server, you should know that we value feedback incredibly as we are always giving our ideas and opinions on various subjects in order to better the wiki; some may not always be good ideas, but all feedback is highly appreciated, and we can try to find a workaround if necessary. No one person has all the say, so everyone can voice their opinions if they wish to. We can argue (in a good way) against each other's ideas to get to the final step. That is what makes it great to work at a wiki.

Just remember to keep comments in a mature and civilized tone (and this applies to everyone, I'm just trying to remind people). I didn't see much issue with one of your summary comments, though I did feel some tension. If you have issues, please feel free to talk to one of the administrators, moderators, or the user you have problems with. I appreciate that you are talking it through with Sarcosmic instead of ignoring the situation as a whole.

You have been a very valued editor this last month, and I can tell you have potential in improving the wiki in many ways, and any other projects you wish to work on outside of MTaP. Continue doing great things, and I hope you can consider moving up as a moderator to further your abilities.

In regards to your points:
 * You make a valid point about inclusion of all into the disambig page.
 * The point of the disambig pages is to redirect the readers to the appropriate page they had intended to search for. These disambig pages should be kept short and simple, so that it doesn't overwhelm the reader with "too much information". Most of the information is kept at their respective pages anyways. For example, Bronze lists all pages with the word "bronze", and each point has a simple description to define what it is, without going into details. In reality, most people skim words and walls of text and only look for keywords. I've adapted to the disambig policy from Wikipedia, and took some inspiration from their disambig pages, such as Apple (disambiguation)
 * As for including blueprints and relic pieces, here are my opinions:
 * Full relics are considered its own "disambig" page, which is why we don't have a disambig page for all relics (even though disambigs only started recently). It would be impractical to make a disambig for all relics, especially since these disambigs would need the (disambiguation) tag, and search results don't prioritize on disambigs or any other page. Regardless, making a disambig page (that only have relics) is just an unnecessary additional step in navigation when you can just go to the actual page itself. I am only including this point as to why we won't be making disambigs for all relics.
 * We can workaround the inclusion, by adding things in parentheses. For example, instead of listing every page in its own bullet point, we can list the "parent and child" pages side-by-side. See below:
 * Water Wheel ( Diagram), short description
 * Porcelain Waterholder ( Piece 1, Piece 2), short description
 * This way we can still include all without going into too much details. This example isn't set in stone, so we can fix it and make it better if needed.

Anyways, if you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to any of the moderating team. We are more than happy to help.

Take care.