Thread:Paladin Aladin/@comment-38109392-20190904010601/@comment-26491435-20190904120818

it sucks ... it was a really long answer :/ .... and I didn't safe it externally .... so I try it again

Hi there,

yes, I was really pissed of course, because it was some work to gather all that water items and its data, and it was you the third time, who "destroyed" one of "my" working sites.

Since I'm a german mechanical engineer imho such overview-sites definitely should contain more than only the names and absolutely basic kind of the items, as propagated on that style-sites. I think, at least the usage and the common obtaining possibilities should be mentioned, so one reads that info and may decide "ok, that's all I need to know about this item" or "hm interesting, but now I want to know the whole story" and follows the links ... ah, links: there I'm really torn between "one link for each item at its first appearance" or links spread all over the site ... problem: if there is a bunch of text and paragraphs with repeated linkable items on a site, how to quickly find the first appearance of the searched item, while that black/blue contrast sometimes is hard to catch on sites with picture backgrounds and if the links are not underlined to differ from "normal" text ... some years ago I programmed websites with alphabetical sorted list of all links, used in that sites on the right side, so one could easily find each searched link - but this don't match the wiki-site-style :/

And since relic pieces, blueprints and diagrams ARE separate items, mostly with its own sites, imho they should be listed as separate points on the disamb. sites too ... but who am I, to tell you such things :)